Movie Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Movie Analysis - Essay ExampleIn the film, juror 8 made a statement that it is possible and not probable that the boy is the killer (Sidney, 12 Angry Men). Juror 8 uses this to justify the innocence of the boy because they are all(prenominal) not authoritative that the boy is guilty. Juror 8 trains this decision based on reasoning. Flaws in human acquaintance can have-to doe with areas of knowledge, thus affect or even change peoples beliefs. In the film, juror 4 believes that despite the fact that there was no evidence proving that the boy was guilty, front line of an eyewitness who saw the incident is indisputable evidence that makes the boy guilty. At this point, juror 4 drew from personal experiences and used deductive reasoning to make statements that make him believe that the boy is guilty. However, the jurors perception was flawed because he did not realize smaller details. It is clear that small flaws in our perception can affect our beliefs and thus, our judgment. Juro r 10 had a perception that people from the slums commit crimes. Juror 10 perception and beliefs towards people from the slums clouded his judgment reservation him believe that the boy was guilty. Emotion and perception can mold or even alter a persons beliefs in a certain way. The emotions, reasoning, and perceptions of the 11 jurors forced them to believe that the boy was guilty (Sidney, 12 Angry Men). Some of these perceptions are based on personal experiences while other depended on logic and personal reasoning.The effect of reasoning and perception depicted in the film 12 Angry Men is also evident in our unremarkable lives. The issue about the potentials and abilities of people with disability has been met with many misinterpretations due to varying peoples perceptions and beliefs towards such people. People who are not exposed to individuals with disabilities frequently perceive that these persons are weaker compared to other people.